Martindale-Hubbell Congratulates Our New AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys 8/6/18
Martindale-Hubbell is proud to announce that the following attorneys have achieved a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, awarded to only those lawyers with the highest ethical standards and professional ability.
- Allison Cherry Lafferty of Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson
- Andrew Burton Pickett of Andrew Pickett Law, PLLC
- Anne Katherine Guillory of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
- Antwon Marcel Emery of Torres Law Group
- Brendan H. Fitzpatrick of Goldberg Segalla LLP
- Brian William Rush of Dan Newlin & Partners
- Bryan McDaniel Taylor
- Clay M. Townsend of Morgan & Morgan
- Cole M. Lindemann of Manley & Brautigam, P.C.
- Craig Minko of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.
- David E. Stovall of Wilkins Patterson Smith Pumphrey & Stephenson, P.A.
- David J. O’Connell of Goldberg Segalla LLP
- Emily Jones of Jones Law Firm PLLC
- H. Warren Sanger
- Stewart Duggan of Brinson, Askew, Berry, Seigler, Richardson & Davis, LLP
- Jonathan E. Groth of Goldberg Segalla LLP
- Kristen L. Wilson of Goldberg Segalla LLP
- Matthew Dabbney Pineda of Pineda Law PLLC
- Michael Colin Barrows of Law Offices of Anthony A. Capetola
- Michael Lawrence Schwebel of Billing, Cochran, Lyles, Mauro & Ramsey, P.A.
- Michael Todd Freeman of Samuel I. White, P.C.
- R. Samuel Dunaway of Dan Newlin & Partners
- Sharon Patricia O’Day of O’Day Resolutions
- William T. Young of Gallivan, White & Boyd, P.A.
Only approximately 10% of attorneys have achieved this prestigious honor. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings, visit our Ratings and Reviews page. Attorneys who are interested in starting their own peer review process can submit the form below.
Martindale-Hubbell conducts secure online Peer Review Ratings surveys of lawyers across multiple jurisdictions and geographic locations, in similar areas of practice as the lawyer being rated. Reviewers are instructed to assess their colleagues’ general ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice.
The ratings help buyers of legal services identify, evaluate and select the most appropriate lawyer for a specific task at hand. The confidentiality, objectivity and complete independence of the ratings process are what has made the program a unique and credible evaluation tool for members of the legal profession. The legal community values the accuracy of lawyer peer review ratings because they are determined by their peers – the people who are best suited to assess the legal ability and professional ethics of their colleagues.
Peer Review Rating award status can go up or down based on subsequent reviews. Please click on an attorney’s profile link to determine current award status.