Martindale-Hubbell is proud to announce that the following attorneys have achieved a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, awarded to only those lawyers with the highest ethical standards and professional ability.

Congratulations to:

Heidi Harris
Lisa Johnson of Lisa L. Johnson, Attorney at Law
Bradley Dede of Bradley Dede LLC
Samuel Davis of Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C.
Ernest Ching of Ching & Associates
Wendy Hardin of Joye, Nappier, Risher, Hardin LLC
Timothy Flynn of Clarkston Legal, PLC
David Krangle of Alonso Krangle LLP
Jeffrey Adams of The Law Office of Jeff Adams, PLLC
Heather Visali of Sasso & Guerrero
Stacey Valdez of Stacey Valdez and Associates
Melvin Vaughn of Agricola Law
James Judkins of James M. Judkins
Danielle L. Borel of Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P.
Landon Reeves of Reeves Law Firm
Andrew Boughrum of Jacobowitz and Gubits, LLP
Jaime Seaton of BGS Law, LLC
William Callahan of Gentry Locke Attorneys
Domenic Romano of Romano Law PLLC
Bonnie Green of The Green Firm, PLLC
Charles Cuzydlo of Cuzydlo Law Group, PLLC
Stephanie Proffitt of Proffitt & Associates
Jason Pollack of Law Offices of Jason Pollack
Seth Caywood of McAtee & Woods, P.C.
Vincent Eisinger of Cranfill Sumner LLP
Erik Anderson of Post & Schell, P.C.
G. Douglas Stephens of Stephens Fiddes McGill and Associates, P.C.
Michael Greer of Greer, Russell & Dent, PLLC
Thomas J. Kroczynski of Martin Clearwater & Bell LLP
James Mackey of Amourgis & Associates
Samuel Miller
Colleen Migl of Quadros, Migl & Crosby PLLC
Daniel Seiden of Seiden & Kaufman Attorneys at Law

Only approximately 10% of attorneys have achieved this prestigious honor. Visit our Ratings and Reviews page for more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings. Attorneys who are interested in starting their own peer review process can submit the form below.


Martindale-Hubbell conducts secure online Peer Review Ratings surveys of lawyers across multiple jurisdictions and geographic locations in similar areas of practice as the lawyer being rated. Reviewers are instructed to assess their colleagues’ general ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice.
The ratings help buyers of legal services identify, evaluate and select the most appropriate lawyer for a specific task at hand. The confidentiality, objectivity, and complete independence of the rating process are what has made the program a unique and credible evaluation tool for members of the legal profession. The legal community values the accuracy of lawyer peer review ratings because they are determined by their peers – the people who are best suited to assess the legal ability and professional ethics of their colleagues.
Peer Review Rating award status can go up or down based on subsequent reviews. Please click on an attorney’s profile link to determine their current award status.