Martindale-Hubbell is proud to announce that the following attorneys have achieved a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, awarded to only those lawyers with the highest ethical standards and professional ability. Congratulations to:

Congratulations to:

Lynn Gorelick of Gorelick Law Offices
Kate Sharkey of McDonough of McDonough Law, LLC
Grant Rogers of Hoover Rogers Law, LLP
Tyler Peters of Payne & Jones, Chartered
L. Thomas Ryan of Ryan, Hicks, Cumpton & Cumpton LLP
Charles Coant of Charles I. Coant, L.L.C.
Alaleh Kamran of Law Office of Alaleh Kamran
Nicole J. Benjamin of Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.
Lindsay Haber of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L.
Marisa O’Sullivan of Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, L.L.P.
Denise Pereira of Pereira Law
Bill Zuhdi of Bill Zuhdi, Attorney at Law, P.C.
Heather Olsen of Legal Consulting Group, LLC
Celia Leber of Leber IP Law
Joel Alcide
Andrew Morgan of Canan Law
Florian Bruno of Bruno Law LLC
Adam Bates of Peddicord, Wharton, Spencer, Hook, Barron and Wegman, LLP
Shari Goldsberry of Goldsberry & Associates, PLLC
Matthew Cave of Kibler Fowler & Cave LLP
Alissa Kranz of Cantrell Zwetsch, P.A.
Christopher Arnold of Hope, O’Dwyer, Wilson & Arnold, P.A.
Brian Folland of The Folland Law Group
Bruce Rosenwater of Bruce S. Rosenwater & Associates, P.A.
Rae Shearn of Rae Shearn, PA
Timothy Mahoney of Tim Mahoney Attorney at Law PC
Joshua Roberts of Roberts Law, PLLC
Andrew Tolchin of 713.Mediator
Timothy Billick of TBillick Law PLLC
Jeremy L. Dubyak of Southtrust Law & Title, Inc.
David Robb Maass

Only approximately 10% of attorneys have achieved this prestigious honor. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings, visit our Ratings and Reviews page. Attorneys who are interested in starting their own peer review process can submit the form below.


Martindale-Hubbell conducts secure online Peer Review Ratings surveys of lawyers across multiple jurisdictions and geographic locations, in similar areas of practice as the lawyer being rated. Reviewers are instructed to assess their colleagues’ general ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice.
The ratings help buyers of legal services identify, evaluate and select the most appropriate lawyer for a specific task at hand. The confidentiality, objectivity, and complete independence of the rating process are what have made the program a unique and credible evaluation tool for members of the legal profession. The legal community values the accuracy of lawyer peer review ratings because they are determined by their peers – the people who are best suited to assess the legal ability and professional ethics of their colleagues.
Peer Review Rating award status can go up or down based on subsequent reviews. Please click on an attorney’s profile link to determine current award status.