Martindale-Hubbell is proud to announce that the following attorneys have achieved a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating, awarded to only those lawyers with the highest ethical standards and professional ability.

Congratulations to:

Deborah L. Brouwer of Nemeth Law, P.C.
Michael Scott Davis of Davis Hartman Wright PLLC
Frances DeThomas of Tyre & DeThomas, P.C.
Josh Wallenstein of The Wallenstein Law Group
Todd Barksdale Law Office of Todd H. Barksdale, PC
Mark Daniel of Daniel Law Office, P.C.
Mark Stout of Stout & Stout Lawyers LLP
Randolph Lee of Batten Lee PLLC
Cathleen Rebar of Rebar Kelly
Kristen Lynn of Law Offices of Ericson, Scalise & Mangan, P.C.
Andrew Herreth of Herreth Law, PLLC
Paul Phillips of Flynn & Phillips, LLC
Garry Salomon of Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C.
Warner Mendenhall of Mendenhall Law Group
Shannon Locke of The Locke Law Group
Anthony Verna of Verna Law, P.C.
Frank Bartlett of Bartlett Legal Group, LLC
W. Scott Harkey of Harkey Litigation
Brian Roberts of Roberts & Reiter, P.A.
Stuart Finz of Finz & Finz, P.C.
Todd Rubin of Finz & Finz, P.C.
Christina Tillinger of Krieger & Tillinger
Adam Reed of Reed Carter
Larissa N. Byers of The Law Offices of Frank F. Daily, P.A.
Zachary Cohen of Zachary A. Cohen Attorney at Law
Molly Sasso of Sasso & Guerrero
Kaysia Earley of Earley Law Firm PLLC
J. Alexander Joyner of Wilkes Atkinson & Joyner, LLC
Clayton Smith of Clayton Smith

Only approximately 10% of attorneys have achieved this prestigious honor. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings, visit our Ratings and Reviews page. Attorneys who are interested in starting their own peer review process can submit the form below.


Martindale-Hubbell conducts secure online Peer Review Ratings surveys of lawyers across multiple jurisdictions and geographic locations, in similar areas of practice as the lawyer being rated. Reviewers are instructed to assess their colleagues’ general ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice.
The ratings help buyers of legal services identify, evaluate and select the most appropriate lawyer for a specific task at hand. The confidentiality, objectivity, and complete independence of the rating process are what have made the program a unique and credible evaluation tool for members of the legal profession. The legal community values the accuracy of lawyer peer review ratings because they are determined by their peers – the people who are best suited to assess the legal ability and professional ethics of their colleagues.
Peer Review Rating award status can go up or down based on subsequent reviews. Please click on an attorney’s profile link to determine their current award status.